[Home ] [Archive]    
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 15, Issue 4 (September & October 2010 2010) ::
pajoohande 2010, 15(4): 143-151 Back to browse issues page
Setting research priority in Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences: methods, challenges, limitations
Ali- Asghar Kolahi , Mohammad-Reza Sohrabi , Morteza Abdollahi , Hamid Soori *
, hsoori@sbmu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (12358 Views)
Background and Aim: Diversity and complexity of health related issues along with the limitation of resources make research priorities setting inevitable. In this article we report the method, problems, limitations, barriers and outcomes of the project of setting research priority in Shahid Beheahti University of Medical Sciences. Materials and Methods: This study involved 91 departments of eight schools and 830 stakeholders in 2009-10. There were five basic principles including stakeholders’ participation, situation analysis and need assessment, defining research priority topics, scoring according to the criteria, and defining priorities based on the most agreed topics. This was a modified version of the proposed model of “The Council on Health Research for Development” (COHRED). Results: The research priorities of 91 educational departments from schools of medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, nursery and midwifery, public health, nutrition, paramedical sciences, and rehabilitation were determined. 610 faculty members and 220 other health system stakeholders and health related persons outside the university were involved in this project. Finally 841 research fields and about 1900 sub-fields were defined as the research priorities. ‍Conclusion: It seems that the COHRED model is suitable for setting research priority in educational departments. We hope that research priorities lead researchers to design their proposals in accordance with the priorities and also act as a tool for policy makers to effectively manage limited resources.
Keywords: Research Priority, COHRED, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Resource Allocation, Stakeholder, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 139 kb]   (3024 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Medicine
Received: 2017 | Accepted: 2017 | Published: 2017
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ali- Asghar Kolahi, Mohammad-Reza Sohrabi, Morteza Abdollahi, Hamid Soori. Setting research priority in Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences: methods, challenges, limitations. pajoohande 2010; 15 (4) :143-151
URL: http://pajoohande.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-987-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 15, Issue 4 (September & October 2010 2010) Back to browse issues page
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645