[Home ] [Archive]    
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 12, Issue 4 (october- november 2007) ::
pajoohande 2007, 12(4): 339-343 Back to browse issues page
Determining the Valubility of Visual Findings of Laparoscopy in Diagnosing the Endometriosis
Salehpour S * , Zhaam H , Hakimirard M , Azarghashb E
, Saghar-salehpour@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (12945 Views)
Background: Endometriosis has been widely implicated as one of the causes of chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and infertility.The purpose of our study was to define the correlation between the visual and histological diagnosis of endometriosis by comparing peritoneal findings identified at laparoscopy in a diagnostic trial with a standardized technique including complete excision of lesions suggestive of endometriosis and systematic biopsies of normal appearing pelvic peritoneum. This study was performed in Mahdieh Hospital and IRHRC from 1383 to 1384. Materials and Methods: A diagnostic study of 30 patients (15- 45 yr.) undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy for the evaluation of chronic pelvic pain, infertility, dysmenorrhea and dysparonia was carried out (average age was 28.6 ± 5.14 (mean ±SD)). All suggestive areas of endometriosis were excised and examined pathologically. Additionally, peritoneal biopsy specimens were obtained from normal appearing peritoneum to rule out microscopic endometriosis. The positive predictive value, sensitivity, negative predictive value and specificity of visually identified endometriosis were determined in comparison with histological findings (definitive diagnosis). Results: The mean prevalence of endometriosis abnormalities in visual and histological diagnosis were 63% and 42%, respectively. The measured values, therfore, for visual versus histological diagnosis of endometriosis were 42.1% for positive predictive value, 88.8% for sensitivity, 90.9% for negative predictive value and 47.6% for specificity. Conclusion: A diagnosis of endometriosis should be established only after histological confirmation.
Keywords: Endometriosis, Laparoscopy, Histopathology
Full-Text [PDF 115 kb]   (2003 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Medicine
Received: 2017 | Accepted: 2017 | Published: 2017
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Salehpour S, Zhaam H, Hakimirard M, Azarghashb E. Determining the Valubility of Visual Findings of Laparoscopy in Diagnosing the Endometriosis. pajoohande 2007; 12 (4) :339-343
URL: http://pajoohande.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-595-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 12, Issue 4 (october- november 2007) Back to browse issues page
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660