[Home ] [Archive]    
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 19, Issue 5 (November & December 2014) ::
pajoohande 2014, 19(5): 251-258 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of direct and indirect conjugation methods to produce a targeting nanodrug with more biocompatibility, high cellular uptake and binding for photothermal therapy of breast cancer
Zahra Heidari , Reyhaneh Sariri , Mojtaba Salouti *
; Associate Professor of Medical Physics, Biology Research Center, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran , Saloutim@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (7466 Views)
Background and Aim: These nanomaterials are currently under investigation and developing for applications related to cancer therapy. To improve efficiency for targeted treatment of malignant tumors, we compare the two conjugation methods (direct and indirect) for production of bombesin-gold nanorods conjugate against gasterin release peptide receptor as a targeted photothermal therapy agent for breast tumor. Materials and Methods: Bombesin conjugated with gold nanorods using the direct and indirect methods was used. The attachment of bombesin to gold nanorods and in vitro stability of two conjugates in mouse blood was studied by UV/vis spectroscopy. Cell toxicity for both of conjugate was investigated by MTT test. Selective binding and cellular uptake studies were performed with the T47D cell line. Results obtained of two conjugates compared to introduce best conjugation method. Results: UV-vis spectroscopy confirmed the conjugation of bombesin with gold nanorods in two methods. The stability assessment proved same and high stability of two conjugates in mouse blood up to 4 h. Cytotoxicity study showed higher biocompatibility of indirect conjugate of bombesin and gold nanorods in comparison with its direct conjugate. In vitro studies showed that indirect conjugate of bombesin and gold nanorods have four-fold binding and cellular uptake in comparison with its direct conjugate. ‍Conclusion: These results show that the indirect conjugation was better than the direct conjugation to produce targeted nanodrug with low cytotoxicity, high binding and cellular uptake for photothermal therapy of breast cancer.
Keywords: Targeting nanodrug, Indirect conjugation, Direct conjugation, Biocompatibility, Cellular uptake, Cellular Binding, Breast cancer
Full-Text [P DF 704 kb]   (1826 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Medicine
Received: 2017 | Accepted: 2017 | Published: 2017
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zahra Heidari, Reyhaneh Sariri, Mojtaba Salouti. Comparison of direct and indirect conjugation methods to produce a targeting nanodrug with more biocompatibility, high cellular uptake and binding for photothermal therapy of breast cancer. pajoohande 2014; 19 (5) :251-258
URL: http://pajoohande.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-1830-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 19, Issue 5 (November & December 2014) Back to browse issues page
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660