[Home ] [Archive]    
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 18, Issue 4 (October & November 2013 2013) ::
pajoohande 2013, 18(4): 182-188 Back to browse issues page
Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly high-risk patients: Dynamic hip screw vs. external fixation
Gholam-Hossein Kazemian , Ali-Reza Manafi , Farideh Najafi * , Mohammad-Amin Najafi
Resident of Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedics, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , faridehnajafi1@gmail.com
Abstract:   (9663 Views)
Background and Aim: Although the use of a dynamic hip screw (DHS) is considered to be the suitable treatment for intertrochanteric fractures, the external fixation device could produce clinical outcomes comparable to the outcomes obtained with conventional treatment. Furthermore, because external fixation is minimally invasive, we expected a lower rate of morbidity. Therefore, we compared the two treatments in a clinical trial of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture. Materials and Methods: Participants were included 60 elderly high-risk patients with an age of 785.6 years who were treated for intertrochanteric fracture, resulting from a low energy trauma. Patients were randomly divided in two conditions regarding the treatment. In group A, the patients were treated with DHS, while in group B patients were treated with external fixator. Results: The fixator was well accepted and no patient had significant difficulties while sitting or lying. The intraoperative time was 7310 minutes in group A and 158 minutes in group B (p<0.01). 27 patients of group A needed blood transfusion postoperatively and none in group B (p<0.001). The duration of hospitalization in group A and group B was 8.42 and 2.21.5 days, respectively (p<0.05). 9 of patients in group B had pin-track infection grade 2 that all were treated by oral antibiotics. There were no differences in comorbidities, quality of reduction, screw cut out, bed sore and HHS between the two groups. ‍Conclusion: Treatment with external fixator is an effective treatment for intertrochanteric fractures in elderly high-risk patients. The advantages include quick and simple application, minimal blood loss, less radiation exposure, adequate fixation, pain reduction, and early discharge from hospital, low costs and favorable functional outcomes.
Keywords: Intertrochanteric fractures, External fixator, Dynamic hip screw, Harris Hip Score
Full-Text [PDF 475 kb]   (2386 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Medicine
Received: 2017 | Accepted: 2017 | Published: 2017
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Gholam-Hossein Kazemian, Ali-Reza Manafi, Farideh Najafi, Mohammad-Amin Najafi. Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly high-risk patients: Dynamic hip screw vs. external fixation. pajoohande 2013; 18 (4) :182-188
URL: http://pajoohande.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-1587-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 18, Issue 4 (October & November 2013 2013) Back to browse issues page
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645