:: Volume 16, Issue 2 (May & June 2011 2011) ::
pajoohande 2011, 16(2): 94-108 Back to browse issues page
Outcomes of Endoscopic third ventriculostomy compared with shunt insertion in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus in Mofid Hospital using the ETV Success Score between 2008 and 2010
Hassan Reza Mohammadi , Parisa Azimi *
Resident, Department of Neurosurgery, Imam Hossain Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , parisa.azimi@gmail.com
Abstract:   (14968 Views)
Background and Aim: There is limited information about the therapeutic results in patients with hydrocephalus in the country however, it is important to know the results of Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in these patients compared to shunt investment. Thus, the research was conducted on admitted patients with hydrocephalus during 2008 to 2010. Materials and Methods: This was a cross sectional study. The therapeutic results were calculated using ETVSS (ETV Success Score) for all patients diagnosed with hydrocephalus and had undergone surgery. Survival rate of patients with shunt or ETV were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: During the two year study, 96 patients were found eligible. Patients aged from 3 days to 14 years (mean: 2.4±3.33) and had at least six months of follow-up. ETV survival rate was greater than shunt in ETVSS≥80 (100% versus 40% P=0.02). The more the ETVSS, the survival of patients treated with ETV is more than shunt investment. ‍Conclusion: It seems that ETV technique is more successful in patients with higher ETVSS. We recommend further research in this regard.
Keywords: Endoscopy, Endoscopic third ventriculostomy, ETVSS, Shunt, Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt, Hydrocephalus
Full-Text [PDF 289 kb]   (4872 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Medicine
Received: 2017 | Accepted: 2017 | Published: 2017


XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 16, Issue 2 (May & June 2011 2011) Back to browse issues page